|
Tyler Huynh
9/26/2023 09:13:13 pm
In order for the government to be less prone to issues and ensure fluidity, age limits should be implements for US elected officials in office. According to Pew Research Center, nowadays, a large majority of young adults have access to technology and the Internet, meaning the are able to freely immerse themselves in todays politics. Although they may be able to attain knowledge of politics, however, they still lack experience in comparison to middle-age men, as they have most likely partook in the country's politics, whether it be at the city or state level. This goes to show that the enabling of young adults to partake in the US Office is detrimental. Not only younger individuals, but also older people should be prohibited from being elected as US officials. Despite usually having more experience, older individuals have reliability weakening traits. Based on research conducted by Harvard, older individuals aren't able to learn, remember, and solve problems as easily as middle-aged individuals are. Therefore, age for US elected officials should be restricted to middle-aged, age 45 to 65. 9/27/2023 06:22:29 am
Age limits should be set for US elected officials in office because older people are usually better at making political decisions. In the US, "life expectancy has been increasing, meaning there are more politically relevant generations than ever before—and more politicians capable of performing their duties as they age." As a result, the larger generation of older people in the US are more well-versed in politics and controversial issues than the typical teenager or early adult, making them a better representative to make decisions. Therefore, there should be age limits for Americans to take on officials in the government because of the knowledge and wisdom of the elders.
Emma Xi
9/27/2023 03:21:01 pm
Age limits should be set for U.S. elected officials because of concern for their mental acuity, health, and knowledge of today's generation. According to Harvard Health, most cognitive functions decrease with age: the hippocampus shrinks and the myelin sheath surrounding nerves wears down. The hippocampus is a region of the brain responsible for long-term memory and memory retrieval. Senior politicians may have more trouble relaying relevant information from the past while making decisions that could affect the entire country. The myelin sheath around neurons, which send and receive signals, allows for fast, accurate transfer of information to and from the brain. As the myelin sheath wears down with time, neurons do not communicate as efficiently, leading to the lack of ability to encode new information and retrieve old information, according to Harvard Health. Furthermore, U.S. officials, especially presidents, must travel internationally to meet with other officials from other states. Air travel can be tedious, leading to tiredness and interrupted circadian rhythms. This is especially imminent in older people, as their immune systems are weaker, allowing the lack of sleep to cause new diseases or bacteria to spread. Though the older someone is, the more their dendrites branch, allowing them to connect diverse pictures into one "global picture" recent U.S. court decisions have spiked controversy online, which may be correlated to the last two presidents being the oldest ever. Additionally, elected officials born in the mid-1900s, as most are, likely do not understand the aspects of today's society. Most notably in the abortion law, the government makes decisions that cause great disadvantage to minorities, like women. The government, with some officials in the 80s and 90s, is causing more rebellion and leading to more systemic racism than intended. Lastly, according to Northeastern University news, recent polling showed that more than half Americans support a maximum age limit, including prominent public figures like Elon Musk and former president Jimmy Carter. Though passing a constitution of this magnitude is difficult, I think setting a maximum age limit is essential for the better of the country.
Sophia Hernandez
9/27/2023 03:44:15 pm
Age limits should be set for US elected officials in office on both sides of the age spectrum, to ensure that governmental policies and procedures are implemented in mental and physical stability. People on the younger side of the spectrum should not be able to run for office, as their decision making skills are not fully developed The human brain is not fully developed until the age of 25, and having at least 10 years working a steady job is also important for an official. Having a fully developed brain and experience so that the official is able to make sound decisions takes time, so an official for office should be at least 35. However, those who are 'too old' to work in office should also be limited to other jobs not involving governmental procedure. Cognitive decay can begin at anytime in life starting in a person's 20's, but by someone's 60's and especially 70's, cognitive decay is inevitable for all. Because cognitive decay begins in one's 60's and 70's, those who are in office who are in their early to mid 70s should not be elected, as their decision making processes are permanently decaying. Age limits on either side of the age spectrum are important and should be implemented for decision making for US elected officials to ensure that clear and conscientious policies are administered.
Alia AlAli
9/27/2023 05:03:12 pm
Yes, age limits should be set on government officials. Many people argue that age limits can help ensure that individuals in key government positions have the necessary experience and maturity to make informed decisions. However, opponents argue that age limits can be hit or miss and discriminatory, potentially excluding capable individuals based solely on age. The decision to impose age limits should carefully consider the specific requirements of government positions and the potential benefits and drawbacks of such limits.
Yuxiang Zhao
9/27/2023 06:32:44 pm
Elected officials is vital to the functioning of our democracy, and our officials needs to have energy ready to make sound decisions and govern effectively. Age limits should be set for US elected officials in office since younger officials have more energy, and they are more adaptive to changes. Public office demands tremendous energy to stand the exhausting schedules, negotiations, and many unexpected crises. Younger people have more energy and stamina. They can keep going and going long after older people cannot or have had enough according to psychreg.org. In an era of rapid technological and social change, older elected officials may struggle to understand or realize problems in our society, and come up with the best decisions. Overall, with age limits we could bring in younger officials that are more informed about current society and more responsive, which will strengthen the foundation of our democracy for generations to come.
Dasha Santiago
9/27/2023 09:40:36 pm
Age limits should be set for US elected officials in office because it is dangerous for older officials and can also negatively affect our country. According to Professor Peter Jones from the University of Cambridge, "...a definition of when you move from childhood to adulthood...is a much more nuanced transition that takes place over three decades." We shouldn't allow younger political leaders into office due to the fact their brains aren't 100% developed. The more appropriate age for a US elected official to be in office would be around middle age. Even though younger people shouldn't be in office, older people shouldn't either. For example, the National Institute of Health says, "Older adults may: be slower to find words and recall names, have problems with multitasking, experience mild decrease in the ability to pay attention." These are all tasks an elected office official should be able to perform without trouble. Therefore, an age limit should be kept to maintain the government's balance. 9/27/2023 09:57:34 pm
I do believe that age limits should be set for elected officials. Studies done by the Center for Disease Control state that one out of every eleven seniors older than 65 are susceptible to Alzheimer's Disease. This disease causes one to exhibit a loss of memory due to Alzheimer's Disease being the leading cause of 92,604 deaths in the year 2014. This would lead to constant forgetfulness and would be an embarrassment to their office. Second, seniors are more likely to experience falls. The CDC claims that 2.5 million seniors 65 years or older experience falls. Again, it would be terrible if the leader of a nation were to appear clumsy out of no fault of their own. Age limits should be set for people over the age of 65.
Alexander Ferrel
9/27/2023 09:59:17 pm
Given the rising average age of Congressmen and the probable health risks of aging, there should be an age restriction for U.S. elected officials. The necessity to assess how aging affects political leadership is highlighted by recent occurrences involving senior lawmakers like Mitch McConnell and Dianne Feinstein. The median age of senators, according to NBC data, is at a record high of 65, raising questions about cognitive deterioration and decision-making effectiveness. Age restrictions could be put in place to balance the need for new viewpoints in governance with the value of experience.
Mrs. Adcox
9/29/2023 03:06:20 pm
Feinstein just passed away a day after you posted this, how crazy!
Adriana Avalos
9/27/2023 10:13:31 pm
Age limits should not be set for elected officials because it’s discriminatory and enforcing it would bring government to a stop. Discrimination on the basis of age was a wrong we righted many years ago when the US passed The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. We’ve known for a long time that age is not an accurate measure of how qualified a person is for a job and, since then, society has benefitted from having a healthy age mix in the workforce. Also, research has shown that not all people age at the same pace as others and that there can be a clear difference between a person’s chronological age – how many days they have lived – and their biological age – how healthy their DNA is. Without knowing a person’s biological age, there would be no way to be sure whether they would be more or less prone to health issues than any other person of their same chronological age. Moreover, if such a restriction passed, the government would come to a stop. It is unrealistic to think that this age limit could be enforced since more than 70% of current U.S. Senators, for example, would have to leave their offices, if the age limit were set at 70 years old. 9/28/2023 05:41:50 am
An age limit should be set for elected officials in office because of their experience. According to "The Time Records", in the US, a person needs to be 35 years old or older to be president. Also, a person must be at least 25 in order to serve in the House of Representatives, and 30 for serving in the Senate. These requirements are good since this allows for experienced professionals to run our government. But an age limit "max": should be set. As of our current president, Joe Biden, he is 80 years old. I would say that, at that age, our body is degrading. Some systems begin aging as early as age 30. At age 80, the human body isn't capable of many things as much as a younger person. This would reason as to why an age limit being set is beneficial for our government to function at it's fullest.
Aaron Joseph
9/28/2023 07:07:17 am
Aaron Joseph 9/28/2023 05:58:04 pm
Age limits should be set for US elected officials in office. Reports shown by the Centers of Disease Control and prevention have shown that cognitive decline and memory loss are increasing in rate as people age. Some examples of this is 81 year old Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnel froze during a press conference. Another example of this is when 90 year old Senator Dianne Feinstein of California appeared confused during a committee hearing.
Yau Wei Ng
9/28/2023 07:16:50 pm
Age restrictions for elected officials in the United States can be justified by the fact that they are intended to make sure that persons in office continue to have the physical and mental capabilities needed to carry out their duties. Elected leaders have demanding duties that call for good judgment, swift decision-making, and the capacity to handle challenging situations. Age restrictions, when thoughtfully chosen, can allow for experienced people to handle politics, ensuring that elected leaders are still able to handle the changing demands of administration. 9/28/2023 07:47:50 pm
Yes, age limits should be set for U.S. elected officials. There are several reasons for implementing such restrictions. First and foremost, setting age limits promotes the idea of fresh perspectives and innovative ideas into government. Younger individuals often bring a unique set of experiences and a better understanding of modern challenges. Furthermore, age limits address concerns about the physical and mental stamina of elected officials. Public office can be demanding, requiring long hours and a tireless commitment to public service. Younger officials are typically better equipped to handle these demands effectively. Hence, age limits should be set for US elected officials in office.
Mahika Joshi
9/29/2023 04:55:22 am
Setting age limits for elected officials can be important for ensuring the vitality and adaptability of a democratic system. While experience and wisdom are valuable, setting age limits can help mitigate the risk of stagnation and outdated policies and the prolonged hold of power. By mandating retirement from political office at a certain age, it also encourages a regular infusion of fresh perspectives and new ideas into government. This not only fosters more dynamic political ideals but also addresses the potential cognitive decline that can come with advanced age, as has also been displayed on multiple occasions with different politicians and elected officials, ensuring that elected officials remain capable of making sound decisions in the best interest of the people they represent. With age limits present, it allows for leadership to better serve the evolving needs of the people.
Shahid Huda
9/29/2023 05:02:22 am
Yes, there should be an age limit due to the fact that there are optimal ages for brain function. After you become 21-40, some aspects of your ability's begin to decline significantly. Therefore, in order to have the ideal elected officials, there should be an age limit to prevent officials who have no idea what they are doing from being elected. Additionally, the physical and mental strain of being an elected official will be detrimental for their own health. For instance, on Aug. 30, 2023, the 81 year old politician Mitch McConnell froze in what appears to be a mini-stroke.
Shahid Huda
9/29/2023 05:11:14 am
Shahid Huda 9/29/2023 06:51:44 pm
I think there should be an age limit for people who wish to be in positions of power. Many people in their twenties lack the necessary real-world experience to govern and manage a large number of people. Scientific studies show that one's brain is not fully formed until their mid to late twenties. This is why I believe that young people should not be permitted to hold positions of power as it's a time in their lives when they face the most difficulties and real-world encounter. People in their later years should also be obligated to age limitations because while it is true that the elder generation is better prepared to lead, they still pose significant risks to disruptions in the balance due to their vulnerability to disease. The current president and the U.S government are experiencing similar things with people being injured or forgetting things on stage as most of its government is governed by people over the age of 70. Furthermore, Alzheimer's disease, which causes forgetfulness, is becoming more common among elderly adults and is also impacting politicians in the government. In the case that these government powers are out due to their issues then society is left in chaos as there is no longer any one to guide them on the right path. 11/8/2023 10:16:52 am
There should be an age limit for US elected officials because if their isn't then people that are elected survive and stay elected for a long time and possibly death which means that when they get older they might not be able to think correctly which might affect their choices and thinking process. This could lead to problems when making important decisions and new elected officials should be young so they can think properly and logically for better decision making. Leave a Reply. |
RULES1. Respond to the MOST RECENT discussion question or another student's comment within that feed. Archives
November 2023
Categories |
RSS Feed